<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (7) TMI 66 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278258</link>
    <description>A contract of sale is concluded only when offer and acceptance extend to the essential terms, including price; here, the evidence did not show a clear consensus, the broker&#039;s account conflicted with his pleadings, and the plaintiff&#039;s proof was hearsay, so no binding sale contract was established against either principal. A broker who merely negotiates between parties does not incur personal liability for non-performance absent fraud or an independent undertaking; on that basis, no personal liability attached to the broker. The plaintiff therefore failed to prove either a concluded contract or a basis for liability, and the suits failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:30:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (7) TMI 66 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278258</link>
      <description>A contract of sale is concluded only when offer and acceptance extend to the essential terms, including price; here, the evidence did not show a clear consensus, the broker&#039;s account conflicted with his pleadings, and the plaintiff&#039;s proof was hearsay, so no binding sale contract was established against either principal. A broker who merely negotiates between parties does not incur personal liability for non-performance absent fraud or an independent undertaking; on that basis, no personal liability attached to the broker. The plaintiff therefore failed to prove either a concluded contract or a basis for liability, and the suits failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>