<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 9 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16402</link>
    <description>For computing profits under section 41(2) of the Income-tax Act, depreciation allowed to a firm before its reconstitution on a partner&#039;s death is not to be clubbed with depreciation allowed to the newly constituted firm. The relevant deductions are confined to those granted to the assessee-firm in its own hands. On that basis, the depreciation allowed to the erstwhile firm was excluded from the computation, and the question was answered against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:22:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 9 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16402</link>
      <description>For computing profits under section 41(2) of the Income-tax Act, depreciation allowed to a firm before its reconstitution on a partner&#039;s death is not to be clubbed with depreciation allowed to the newly constituted firm. The relevant deductions are confined to those granted to the assessee-firm in its own hands. On that basis, the depreciation allowed to the erstwhile firm was excluded from the computation, and the question was answered against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>