<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 79 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16397</link>
    <description>Whether depreciation could be claimed on assets taken over from a dissolved partnership at a revalued figure was determined by applying s. 43(1) and Explanation 3 of the IT Act. Although revaluation may be relevant in partnership accounting to adjust partners&#039; rights on dissolution, s. 43(1) with its Explanations overrides general partnership law for computing &quot;actual cost&quot; for depreciation. Where assets were previously used by another person and the main purpose of transfer is to secure a higher depreciation allowance to reduce tax liability, Explanation 3 empowers the AO to substitute a reduced actual cost notwithstanding revaluation. Depreciation on the revalued figure was denied, and Explanation 3 was held attracted, in favour of Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 79 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16397</link>
      <description>Whether depreciation could be claimed on assets taken over from a dissolved partnership at a revalued figure was determined by applying s. 43(1) and Explanation 3 of the IT Act. Although revaluation may be relevant in partnership accounting to adjust partners&#039; rights on dissolution, s. 43(1) with its Explanations overrides general partnership law for computing &quot;actual cost&quot; for depreciation. Where assets were previously used by another person and the main purpose of transfer is to secure a higher depreciation allowance to reduce tax liability, Explanation 3 empowers the AO to substitute a reduced actual cost notwithstanding revaluation. Depreciation on the revalued figure was denied, and Explanation 3 was held attracted, in favour of Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>