https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373816 The court admitted the petitioner's winding-up petition under the Companies Act, 1956, following a dispute over payment for additional work completed for the respondent. Despite the respondent's denial based on alleged defects in earlier work, the court found in favor of the petitioner. The Architect's certification confirmed the satisfactory completion of work, undermining the respondent's arguments. The court emphasized the need for genuine disputes in liability claims and appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator, suspending the order for four weeks to allow the respondent to settle outstanding dues before liquidation proceedings. en-us Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373816 The court admitted the petitioner's winding-up petition under the Companies Act, 1956, following a dispute over payment for additional work completed for the respondent. Despite the respondent's denial based on alleged defects in earlier work, the court found in favor of the petitioner. The Architect's certification confirmed the satisfactory completion of work, undermining the respondent's arguments. The court emphasized the need for genuine disputes in liability claims and appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator, suspending the order for four weeks to allow the respondent to settle outstanding dues before liquidation proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373816