<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 962 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373797</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order rejecting the stay application for disputed taxes. The petitioner was directed to file a stay petition before the Appellate Authority within two weeks. The Appellate Authority was instructed to decide on the application within four weeks, with no coercive action against the petitioner until then. No costs were to be incurred in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 962 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373797</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order rejecting the stay application for disputed taxes. The petitioner was directed to file a stay petition before the Appellate Authority within two weeks. The Appellate Authority was instructed to decide on the application within four weeks, with no coercive action against the petitioner until then. No costs were to be incurred in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>