<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 958 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373793</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee for importing goods without a registration certificate under Section 10(A) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The court found that the assessee&#039;s business activities were solely focused on trading two-wheelers and there was no authorization for dealing in the imported generator set and non-woven fabric. The court determined that the use of Form-C for importing unrelated goods constituted a false declaration, establishing mens rea. Previous court decisions cited were distinguished based on differing circumstances. The penalty was upheld as the imported goods were not connected to the assessee&#039;s registered business activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 06:47:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 958 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373793</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee for importing goods without a registration certificate under Section 10(A) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The court found that the assessee&#039;s business activities were solely focused on trading two-wheelers and there was no authorization for dealing in the imported generator set and non-woven fabric. The court determined that the use of Form-C for importing unrelated goods constituted a false declaration, establishing mens rea. Previous court decisions cited were distinguished based on differing circumstances. The penalty was upheld as the imported goods were not connected to the assessee&#039;s registered business activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>