<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 90 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16384</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, determining that the assessee benefitted significantly from customs clearance permits and that transactions with Zip Industries were not genuine. The addition of Rs. 60,000 as undisclosed income was deemed valid. The court supported the Tribunal&#039;s 50% benefit estimation for the assessee, based on substantial evidence. Both Revenue and the assessee&#039;s questions of law were decided against them, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order entirely. Each party was granted costs of Rs. 5,000 in their references.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 90 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16384</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, determining that the assessee benefitted significantly from customs clearance permits and that transactions with Zip Industries were not genuine. The addition of Rs. 60,000 as undisclosed income was deemed valid. The court supported the Tribunal&#039;s 50% benefit estimation for the assessee, based on substantial evidence. Both Revenue and the assessee&#039;s questions of law were decided against them, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order entirely. Each party was granted costs of Rs. 5,000 in their references.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>