<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 62 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16380</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing depreciation on the expenditure for constructing roads, culverts, and sewage lines within or in the vicinity of the factory area for exclusive use by factory workers. The judgment clarified the interpretation of &quot;building&quot; under section 32(1)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing ownership and purpose in determining eligibility for depreciation on such constructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:25:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 62 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16380</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing depreciation on the expenditure for constructing roads, culverts, and sewage lines within or in the vicinity of the factory area for exclusive use by factory workers. The judgment clarified the interpretation of &quot;building&quot; under section 32(1)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing ownership and purpose in determining eligibility for depreciation on such constructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>