<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (12) TMI 161 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278240</link>
    <description>A special leave petition under Article 136 and any appeal following grant of special leave do not fall within the term &quot;appeal&quot; or &quot;proceeding&quot; in Section 13A of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950. The provision was confined to the Act&#039;s own statutory hierarchy of suits, appeals and revisions, and its reference to the date of presentation of the memorandum of appeal showed that only the ordinary appellate process was intended. Section 22 reinforced that the tenant&#039;s right to deposit rent, interest and costs was tied to proceedings under the Act, not to Supreme Court special leave proceedings. The tenant therefore could not claim protection against eviction under Section 13A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 13:03:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (12) TMI 161 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278240</link>
      <description>A special leave petition under Article 136 and any appeal following grant of special leave do not fall within the term &quot;appeal&quot; or &quot;proceeding&quot; in Section 13A of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950. The provision was confined to the Act&#039;s own statutory hierarchy of suits, appeals and revisions, and its reference to the date of presentation of the memorandum of appeal showed that only the ordinary appellate process was intended. Section 22 reinforced that the tenant&#039;s right to deposit rent, interest and costs was tied to proceedings under the Act, not to Supreme Court special leave proceedings. The tenant therefore could not claim protection against eviction under Section 13A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>