<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 952 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373787</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, directing specific adjustments to the arm&#039;s length price of international transactions based on a detailed comparability analysis of functional profiles. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of Rule 10B(2) in the analysis and directed verification of financials for one comparable. Other grounds raised were deemed general or premature and did not require adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 952 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373787</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, directing specific adjustments to the arm&#039;s length price of international transactions based on a detailed comparability analysis of functional profiles. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of Rule 10B(2) in the analysis and directed verification of financials for one comparable. Other grounds raised were deemed general or premature and did not require adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>