<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 939 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373774</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the additions under Sections 68 and 69C of the Income Tax Act were unjustified. It ruled in favor of the assessees, finding the transactions genuine based on documentary evidence provided. The tribunal emphasized that statements from brokers, suggesting otherwise, were inadmissible without cross-examination. All appeals by the assessees were allowed, and the additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:56:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 939 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373774</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the additions under Sections 68 and 69C of the Income Tax Act were unjustified. It ruled in favor of the assessees, finding the transactions genuine based on documentary evidence provided. The tribunal emphasized that statements from brokers, suggesting otherwise, were inadmissible without cross-examination. All appeals by the assessees were allowed, and the additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>