<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 930 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalties imposed by the AO were unsustainable as penalty proceedings should have been initiated and levied by the CIT(A) for the additions made by him. The penalties for estimated additions and disallowances were deemed unjustified. Therefore, the Tribunal ordered the deletion of the penalties, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 930 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalties imposed by the AO were unsustainable as penalty proceedings should have been initiated and levied by the CIT(A) for the additions made by him. The penalties for estimated additions and disallowances were deemed unjustified. Therefore, the Tribunal ordered the deletion of the penalties, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>