<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 921 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373756</link>
    <description>The tribunal found M/s. Trichur Traders liable for penalties due to import process discrepancies but set aside penalties due to lack of direct involvement. Penalties on Shri C. K. Boban were upheld with a reduction, while penalties on Shri A. R. Ajeesh, a CHA worker, were justified and upheld despite a slight reduction. The judgment considered individual roles and circumstances, ultimately leading to varied outcomes in penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:55:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 921 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373756</link>
      <description>The tribunal found M/s. Trichur Traders liable for penalties due to import process discrepancies but set aside penalties due to lack of direct involvement. Penalties on Shri C. K. Boban were upheld with a reduction, while penalties on Shri A. R. Ajeesh, a CHA worker, were justified and upheld despite a slight reduction. The judgment considered individual roles and circumstances, ultimately leading to varied outcomes in penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>