<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 919 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373754</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the imported &quot;hook and eye fastening strips&quot; under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 8308 10 10, agreeing with the appellant&#039;s argument that the goods retain the essential character of hooks and eyes. The Tribunal found the previous judgment relied upon by Customs authorities to be per incuriam as it did not consider relevant provisions, and thus set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 919 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373754</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the imported &quot;hook and eye fastening strips&quot; under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 8308 10 10, agreeing with the appellant&#039;s argument that the goods retain the essential character of hooks and eyes. The Tribunal found the previous judgment relied upon by Customs authorities to be per incuriam as it did not consider relevant provisions, and thus set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>