<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 916 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373751</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order dated 14 October 2016, finding errors in the Commissioner&#039;s denial of the petitioner&#039;s exemption benefit and misapplication of the law. The constitutional validity of Section 35F was not addressed due to other findings. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, granting the relief sought in the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 916 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373751</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order dated 14 October 2016, finding errors in the Commissioner&#039;s denial of the petitioner&#039;s exemption benefit and misapplication of the law. The constitutional validity of Section 35F was not addressed due to other findings. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, granting the relief sought in the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>