<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 909 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373744</link>
    <description>In clandestine removal disputes, seized records, electronic data, statements and other corroborative material may be relied on where they form a consistent chain, even if there are objections to search formalities or minor inconsistencies in witness evidence. Irregularities in the search process do not by themselves destroy the evidentiary value of the mahazar, pen drive, hard disks and private records when the materials remain mutually supportive. A retracted confession is not rejected absent proof of coercion, threat or duress, and may be used with corroboration to establish clandestine manufacture, suppression of production, undervaluation and receipt of extra consideration on a preponderance of probability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 909 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373744</link>
      <description>In clandestine removal disputes, seized records, electronic data, statements and other corroborative material may be relied on where they form a consistent chain, even if there are objections to search formalities or minor inconsistencies in witness evidence. Irregularities in the search process do not by themselves destroy the evidentiary value of the mahazar, pen drive, hard disks and private records when the materials remain mutually supportive. A retracted confession is not rejected absent proof of coercion, threat or duress, and may be used with corroboration to establish clandestine manufacture, suppression of production, undervaluation and receipt of extra consideration on a preponderance of probability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>