<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 907 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order-in-original, deeming the demand and penalties unsustainable as they were solely based on third-party records without conclusive evidence of duty evasion. The lack of direct evidence linking the appellant to clandestine activities resulted in the dismissal of the charges, emphasizing the importance of tangible proof in allegations of duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:54:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 907 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order-in-original, deeming the demand and penalties unsustainable as they were solely based on third-party records without conclusive evidence of duty evasion. The lack of direct evidence linking the appellant to clandestine activities resulted in the dismissal of the charges, emphasizing the importance of tangible proof in allegations of duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>