https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373740 The Tribunal declined to restore the appeal as it had already been disposed of on merits and not dismissed for technical reasons. The appellant's delay in depositing the directed amount after 12 years was not justified. The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with orders and taking prompt legal actions. The appellant's inaction led to the finality of the order, and depositing the amount after such a prolonged delay did not revive their right to challenge the decision. en-us Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:54:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373740 The Tribunal declined to restore the appeal as it had already been disposed of on merits and not dismissed for technical reasons. The appellant's delay in depositing the directed amount after 12 years was not justified. The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with orders and taking prompt legal actions. The appellant's inaction led to the finality of the order, and depositing the amount after such a prolonged delay did not revive their right to challenge the decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373740