<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 904 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373739</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE remained available where the unit&#039;s records showed capital goods purchases, wages, power and fuel es, and clearances during the relevant period, supporting commencement of commercial production before the cut-off date. A later change in ownership did not by itself defeat the remaining exemption period because the transfer had been duly intimated and the applicable circular preserved the benefit where prescribed option and intimation requirements were met. In the absence of any adverse verification report, denial of exemption was not sustainable, and the successor retained the benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:54:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 904 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373739</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE remained available where the unit&#039;s records showed capital goods purchases, wages, power and fuel es, and clearances during the relevant period, supporting commencement of commercial production before the cut-off date. A later change in ownership did not by itself defeat the remaining exemption period because the transfer had been duly intimated and the applicable circular preserved the benefit where prescribed option and intimation requirements were met. In the absence of any adverse verification report, denial of exemption was not sustainable, and the successor retained the benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>