<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 902 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373737</link>
    <description>Cement used for back-filling mine pits as a statutory prerequisite to ore extraction was treated as an input under Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, because the definition of input is wide and the exclusion applies only to goods having no relationship whatsoever with manufacture. The cement was used in an activity integrally connected with ore extraction, which was regarded as the relevant manufacturing process for credit purposes. Cenvat credit was therefore admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:54:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 902 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373737</link>
      <description>Cement used for back-filling mine pits as a statutory prerequisite to ore extraction was treated as an input under Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, because the definition of input is wide and the exclusion applies only to goods having no relationship whatsoever with manufacture. The cement was used in an activity integrally connected with ore extraction, which was regarded as the relevant manufacturing process for credit purposes. Cenvat credit was therefore admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>