<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1817 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by ruling that the sale proceeds of paintings claimed to be gifted were not taxable as business income, deleting the addition of Rs. 50 lakhs. The issue of unexplained income from the sale of paintings was set aside for further verification. Regarding the adoption of Annual Lettable Value (ALV) for deemed let-out properties, the Tribunal directed the AO to compute the deemed rent based on the Municipal rateable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:41:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1817 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by ruling that the sale proceeds of paintings claimed to be gifted were not taxable as business income, deleting the addition of Rs. 50 lakhs. The issue of unexplained income from the sale of paintings was set aside for further verification. Regarding the adoption of Annual Lettable Value (ALV) for deemed let-out properties, the Tribunal directed the AO to compute the deemed rent based on the Municipal rateable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>