<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 26 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16363</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law regarding exceptional circumstances for cash payments exceeding Rs. 2,500 under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment emphasized the need for a holistic consideration of facts to determine the legality of cash payments, highlighting the importance of fulfilling specific conditions as per the Board&#039;s Circular. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow all cash payments was based on factors such as audit reports, genuineness of transactions, and payments made after bank hours, but the judgment stressed that mere insistence by recipients may not suffice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 26 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16363</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law regarding exceptional circumstances for cash payments exceeding Rs. 2,500 under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment emphasized the need for a holistic consideration of facts to determine the legality of cash payments, highlighting the importance of fulfilling specific conditions as per the Board&#039;s Circular. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow all cash payments was based on factors such as audit reports, genuineness of transactions, and payments made after bank hours, but the judgment stressed that mere insistence by recipients may not suffice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>