<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16361</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to bifurcate gains from the sale of a property into long-term capital gains for land and short-term gains for the building. The Court emphasized the separability of land and building as assets, allowing for differential treatment based on the holding period. The judgment favored the assessee, granting exemption under section 80T for the long-term gains and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against bifurcation. The Court concluded that no referable question of law arose, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissing the tax case petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16361</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to bifurcate gains from the sale of a property into long-term capital gains for land and short-term gains for the building. The Court emphasized the separability of land and building as assets, allowing for differential treatment based on the holding period. The judgment favored the assessee, granting exemption under section 80T for the long-term gains and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against bifurcation. The Court concluded that no referable question of law arose, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissing the tax case petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>