https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278217 A related witness is not disqualified as an interested witness merely because of relationship with the deceased, and minor, natural inconsistencies do not amount to material contradictions when the core version is corroborated by medical and scene evidence. On that basis, the acquittal could not be sustained. Interference under Article 136 was also justified because the High Court's appreciation of evidence was perverse and resulted in miscarriage of justice. The reliable eye-witness account established guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the acquittal was reversed. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:34:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278217 A related witness is not disqualified as an interested witness merely because of relationship with the deceased, and minor, natural inconsistencies do not amount to material contradictions when the core version is corroborated by medical and scene evidence. On that basis, the acquittal could not be sustained. Interference under Article 136 was also justified because the High Court's appreciation of evidence was perverse and resulted in miscarriage of justice. The reliable eye-witness account established guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the acquittal was reversed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278217