<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1826 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278207</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 35/2003-C.E. was confined to clearances within the prescribed aggregate monetary limit. The record showed that the appellant&#039;s clearances to a job worker exceeded that threshold, so the statutory condition for exemption was not satisfied. As a result, the benefit of the notification could not be extended and the demand was sustained. The text states that the appeal failed and the order denying exemption was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:04:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1826 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278207</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 35/2003-C.E. was confined to clearances within the prescribed aggregate monetary limit. The record showed that the appellant&#039;s clearances to a job worker exceeded that threshold, so the statutory condition for exemption was not satisfied. As a result, the benefit of the notification could not be extended and the demand was sustained. The text states that the appeal failed and the order denying exemption was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>