<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1575 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and remitted the issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Emphasizing adherence to natural justice rules, the Tribunal directed proper disclosure of statements and reports, allowing the assessee to cross-examine witnesses. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the need for a fair assessment based on facts rather than suspicion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:04:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1575 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and remitted the issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Emphasizing adherence to natural justice rules, the Tribunal directed proper disclosure of statements and reports, allowing the assessee to cross-examine witnesses. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the need for a fair assessment based on facts rather than suspicion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>