<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 21 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16353</link>
    <description>Incentive bonus paid under an industrial settlement, and not as bonus governed by the Payment of Bonus Act, was treated as deductible under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court noted that once the payment fell outside the statutory bonus framework, its allowability was not confined by the bonus ceiling under section 36(1)(ii). The earlier view that incentive bonus is not subject to the statutory ceiling was followed, and the deduction was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 21 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16353</link>
      <description>Incentive bonus paid under an industrial settlement, and not as bonus governed by the Payment of Bonus Act, was treated as deductible under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court noted that once the payment fell outside the statutory bonus framework, its allowability was not confined by the bonus ceiling under section 36(1)(ii). The earlier view that incentive bonus is not subject to the statutory ceiling was followed, and the deduction was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>