<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 861 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373696</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that profits from the sale of apartments were capital gains, not business income. The Court found the initial purchase was for investment, not resale for profit, supporting the capital gains classification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as lacking merit, with the Court emphasizing the absence of evidence showing the property was bought with a profit motive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 861 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373696</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that profits from the sale of apartments were capital gains, not business income. The Court found the initial purchase was for investment, not resale for profit, supporting the capital gains classification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as lacking merit, with the Court emphasizing the absence of evidence showing the property was bought with a profit motive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>