<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 855 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373690</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and directed the deletion of the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of specific evidence and adherence to principles of natural justice in tax assessments, highlighting that the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions lacked concrete evidence and were based on suspicion and surmises. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:10:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 855 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373690</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and directed the deletion of the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of specific evidence and adherence to principles of natural justice in tax assessments, highlighting that the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions lacked concrete evidence and were based on suspicion and surmises. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>