https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373664 Repeal of the Gold (Control) Act without a saving clause was treated as indicating a contrary legislative intention, so Section 6 of the General Clauses Act did not preserve pending show-cause notice proceedings. The Court relied on the statement of objects and reasons, which described the Gold Control regime as unsuccessful and burdensome, and also noted that earlier regulatory changes and the Gold (Control) Ordinance had used express saving clauses for notices. On that basis, the pending notice and proceedings under the repealed regime could not survive, and the connected matters were remitted for further proceedings on merits. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:53:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373664 Repeal of the Gold (Control) Act without a saving clause was treated as indicating a contrary legislative intention, so Section 6 of the General Clauses Act did not preserve pending show-cause notice proceedings. The Court relied on the statement of objects and reasons, which described the Gold Control regime as unsuccessful and burdensome, and also noted that earlier regulatory changes and the Gold (Control) Ordinance had used express saving clauses for notices. On that basis, the pending notice and proceedings under the repealed regime could not survive, and the connected matters were remitted for further proceedings on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373664