<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 826 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal on service tax liabilities related to GTA services, Management Consultancy Services, and Export Sales Commission. The demands raised against the appellant for the period before 18.04.2006 were found unsustainable, and post this date, the demands were held hit by limitation. However, the appellant was liable to discharge any service tax liability within the limitation period from the date of the show cause notice. Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transactions between DTA and EOU units was rejected, with the Tribunal upholding the decision to drop the demands raised by Revenue. The judgment was pronounced on 16.01.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 826 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal on service tax liabilities related to GTA services, Management Consultancy Services, and Export Sales Commission. The demands raised against the appellant for the period before 18.04.2006 were found unsustainable, and post this date, the demands were held hit by limitation. However, the appellant was liable to discharge any service tax liability within the limitation period from the date of the show cause notice. Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transactions between DTA and EOU units was rejected, with the Tribunal upholding the decision to drop the demands raised by Revenue. The judgment was pronounced on 16.01.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>