https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373655 The Tribunal determined that the appellant's product should be classified as Branded Chewing Tobacco (BCT) under heading 24039910 of CETA. As the classification as BCT was upheld, the duty demand against the appellant was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the duty demand was set aside, and both appeals by the appellant were allowed, providing consequential relief. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373655 The Tribunal determined that the appellant's product should be classified as Branded Chewing Tobacco (BCT) under heading 24039910 of CETA. As the classification as BCT was upheld, the duty demand against the appellant was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the duty demand was set aside, and both appeals by the appellant were allowed, providing consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373655