<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 816 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373651</link>
    <description>Structures fabricated at the site during erection of a thermal power station, using steel plates, angles, channels and beams, were held not to be excisable goods because they had no independent existence as movable property. The tribunal applied the settled tests of movability and marketability and found that the structures were embedded to earth, formed part of the plant, and were not shown to be capable of dismantling and removal for use elsewhere. As those essential conditions for excisability were absent, the classification reference under Heading 73.08 did not sustain the duty demand, and the demand was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 816 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373651</link>
      <description>Structures fabricated at the site during erection of a thermal power station, using steel plates, angles, channels and beams, were held not to be excisable goods because they had no independent existence as movable property. The tribunal applied the settled tests of movability and marketability and found that the structures were embedded to earth, formed part of the plant, and were not shown to be capable of dismantling and removal for use elsewhere. As those essential conditions for excisability were absent, the classification reference under Heading 73.08 did not sustain the duty demand, and the demand was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>