<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 804 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373639</link>
    <description>The petitioner&#039;s grievance was treated as resolved once the TDS certificate and Form 16 were received. The Court declined to grant wider directions resembling public interest relief, noting that the petition had not been admitted in that form. The request for prosecution or departmental action under Section 276B was left to the Department&#039;s consideration, and no further merits adjudication was undertaken. The petition was therefore not found to warrant further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:13:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 804 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373639</link>
      <description>The petitioner&#039;s grievance was treated as resolved once the TDS certificate and Form 16 were received. The Court declined to grant wider directions resembling public interest relief, noting that the petition had not been admitted in that form. The request for prosecution or departmental action under Section 276B was left to the Department&#039;s consideration, and no further merits adjudication was undertaken. The petition was therefore not found to warrant further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>