https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373637 The Court dismissed the challenges to the common order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2010-11. It ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, determining that the payments for various services provided, including placement fees, uplinking charges, and production of programs, should be subject to tax deduction under Section 194C rather than Section 194J. The Assessing Officer's order on default under Section 201(1) and levy of interest under Section 201(1A) was not entertained due to the consistent interpretation of the applicable sections. Both appeals were dismissed without costs. en-us Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:13:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373637 The Court dismissed the challenges to the common order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2010-11. It ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, determining that the payments for various services provided, including placement fees, uplinking charges, and production of programs, should be subject to tax deduction under Section 194C rather than Section 194J. The Assessing Officer's order on default under Section 201(1) and levy of interest under Section 201(1A) was not entertained due to the consistent interpretation of the applicable sections. Both appeals were dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373637