<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 800 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373635</link>
    <description>A withdrawn tax claim does not by itself justify penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. Penalty is not automatic merely because an assessee surrenders a claim during assessment; the decisive question is whether the claim involved concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Where the appellate authorities find that the claim was made by bona fide mistake or oversight, rather than deliberate concealment, penalty is not warranted and is not exigible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 12:57:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 800 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373635</link>
      <description>A withdrawn tax claim does not by itself justify penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. Penalty is not automatic merely because an assessee surrenders a claim during assessment; the decisive question is whether the claim involved concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Where the appellate authorities find that the claim was made by bona fide mistake or oversight, rather than deliberate concealment, penalty is not warranted and is not exigible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>