<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 797 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373632</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the deletion of additions concerning the licence fee and share capital. However, the issue of unverifiable advances was remanded back to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal also upheld the deduction under Section 80-IB for Self Cenvat Credit but disagreed with treating the excise duty refund as a capital receipt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 797 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373632</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the deletion of additions concerning the licence fee and share capital. However, the issue of unverifiable advances was remanded back to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal also upheld the deduction under Section 80-IB for Self Cenvat Credit but disagreed with treating the excise duty refund as a capital receipt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>