<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 785 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373620</link>
    <description>The court upheld the legality of the order directing an investigation by the SFIO under Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013. It found that the opinion for investigation was formed based on sufficient material and in public interest, and that previous judicial decisions did not preclude further investigation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the impugned judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 785 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373620</link>
      <description>The court upheld the legality of the order directing an investigation by the SFIO under Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013. It found that the opinion for investigation was formed based on sufficient material and in public interest, and that previous judicial decisions did not preclude further investigation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the impugned judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>