<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 783 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373618</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the motion seeking condonation of a 778-day delay in filing an appeal from an order issued by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court found the supporting affidavit lacked clarity on the realization of the mistake and responsible party within the Customs Department, criticized the Department for negligence, and highlighted the failure to address letters sent for order implementation. Due to the significant delay and gross negligence on the part of Customs officers, the Court concluded that the delay was inexcusable, leading to the dismissal of the motion for condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 783 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373618</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the motion seeking condonation of a 778-day delay in filing an appeal from an order issued by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court found the supporting affidavit lacked clarity on the realization of the mistake and responsible party within the Customs Department, criticized the Department for negligence, and highlighted the failure to address letters sent for order implementation. Due to the significant delay and gross negligence on the part of Customs officers, the Court concluded that the delay was inexcusable, leading to the dismissal of the motion for condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>