<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 777 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373612</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that technical procedural lapses should not result in the denial of substantial benefits when no revenue loss is incurred. The judgment highlighted the importance of compliance with legal provisions and the distinction between substantive and procedural issues in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 777 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373612</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that technical procedural lapses should not result in the denial of substantial benefits when no revenue loss is incurred. The judgment highlighted the importance of compliance with legal provisions and the distinction between substantive and procedural issues in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>