<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 107 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16332</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the assessee in both issues. Expenses on stevedoring charges and port dues were not allowed as weighted deduction under section 35B. The ex-gratia payment made to employees was not deductible under section 37 but should be assessed under the second proviso to section 36(1)(ii). The Tribunal was instructed to provide the assessee with an opportunity to establish eligibility for deduction under that section. The court concluded the matter without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 107 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16332</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the assessee in both issues. Expenses on stevedoring charges and port dues were not allowed as weighted deduction under section 35B. The ex-gratia payment made to employees was not deductible under section 37 but should be assessed under the second proviso to section 36(1)(ii). The Tribunal was instructed to provide the assessee with an opportunity to establish eligibility for deduction under that section. The court concluded the matter without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>