<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 773 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373608</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed initially due to delay and latches, with the petitioner arguing that the delay was not their fault. The court emphasized the importance of condoning delay for substantial justice and directed the petitioner to file an application for condonation of delay. The court highlighted the need for expeditious resolution of the case, originating in 2013, and instructed the Commissioner to consider the application and proceed with the case on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 773 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373608</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed initially due to delay and latches, with the petitioner arguing that the delay was not their fault. The court emphasized the importance of condoning delay for substantial justice and directed the petitioner to file an application for condonation of delay. The court highlighted the need for expeditious resolution of the case, originating in 2013, and instructed the Commissioner to consider the application and proceed with the case on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>