https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373603 A reassessment order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was held unsustainable because the Assessing Authority did not effectively consider the additional written submissions and documents directed to be examined on remand. The earlier remand required a fresh decision after granting opportunity to produce material, and the record indicated only limited reference to documents without meaningful consideration. The existence of an alternate statutory remedy did not prevent writ interference because the challenge involved breach of natural justice and non-compliance with the prior judicial direction. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after considering the assessee's material. en-us Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373603 A reassessment order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was held unsustainable because the Assessing Authority did not effectively consider the additional written submissions and documents directed to be examined on remand. The earlier remand required a fresh decision after granting opportunity to produce material, and the record indicated only limited reference to documents without meaningful consideration. The existence of an alternate statutory remedy did not prevent writ interference because the challenge involved breach of natural justice and non-compliance with the prior judicial direction. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after considering the assessee's material. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373603