<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1245 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278182</link>
    <description>Input service credit is not denied merely because cleaning and telephone services were used at branch offices rather than within the factory premises. The definition of input service does not require availing the service only inside the factory, and the place of use is not decisive by itself. On that basis, credit on cleaning services and telephone services was held admissible, and the Department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:58:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1245 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278182</link>
      <description>Input service credit is not denied merely because cleaning and telephone services were used at branch offices rather than within the factory premises. The definition of input service does not require availing the service only inside the factory, and the place of use is not decisive by itself. On that basis, credit on cleaning services and telephone services was held admissible, and the Department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>