<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (1) TMI 57 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278176</link>
    <description>Rules made under Article 309 were treated as subordinate legislation of general application, and such rules became operative only when published or promulgated in the manner prescribed for giving them legal notice. Because the Government Order itself required publication in the Official Gazette, that publication date governed commencement, not the date of the Order. On that basis, the earlier promotion was not invalid merely because it was made before Gazette publication, since the new rules had not yet taken effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:20:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (1) TMI 57 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278176</link>
      <description>Rules made under Article 309 were treated as subordinate legislation of general application, and such rules became operative only when published or promulgated in the manner prescribed for giving them legal notice. Because the Government Order itself required publication in the Official Gazette, that publication date governed commencement, not the date of the Order. On that basis, the earlier promotion was not invalid merely because it was made before Gazette publication, since the new rules had not yet taken effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>