<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 61 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16318</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the assessment of discount on treasury bills as income from business, not &#039;interest on securities,&#039; and the apportionment of expenses under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the court sided with the Revenue in considering expenses on repairs and maintenance of flats as perquisites for computing disallowance under the same section. Additionally, the court held that interest on sticky advances must be treated as income of the assessee and is taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 61 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16318</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the assessment of discount on treasury bills as income from business, not &#039;interest on securities,&#039; and the apportionment of expenses under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the court sided with the Revenue in considering expenses on repairs and maintenance of flats as perquisites for computing disallowance under the same section. Additionally, the court held that interest on sticky advances must be treated as income of the assessee and is taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>