<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 758 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373593</link>
    <description>Delay of 362 days in filing the appeal before the High Court was condoned after the Court accepted that the lapse arose from an internal difference of opinion among officers followed by a decision to seek legal opinion and proceed with the appeal. The Court treated the circumstances and importance of the matter as sufficient cause, but imposed compensatory costs on the appellant. The appeal was then remitted to the High Court for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 758 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373593</link>
      <description>Delay of 362 days in filing the appeal before the High Court was condoned after the Court accepted that the lapse arose from an internal difference of opinion among officers followed by a decision to seek legal opinion and proceed with the appeal. The Court treated the circumstances and importance of the matter as sufficient cause, but imposed compensatory costs on the appellant. The appeal was then remitted to the High Court for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>