<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 739 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373574</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude certain companies from the list of comparables for Transfer Pricing analysis due to high turnover, brand value, and functional differences. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of comparability based on similar functions and economic conditions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision affirmed the principle of comparing like with like, with the appeal being dismissed on 11th January 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 739 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373574</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude certain companies from the list of comparables for Transfer Pricing analysis due to high turnover, brand value, and functional differences. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of comparability based on similar functions and economic conditions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision affirmed the principle of comparing like with like, with the appeal being dismissed on 11th January 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>