<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 737 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, restricting the disallowance of commission expenditure to the ten persons subject to enquiry by the Assessing Officer. The disallowance for the remaining recipients was deleted, emphasizing that claims supported by documentary evidence cannot be disallowed without proper disproval through enquiry. The Tribunal upheld the A.O.&#039;s decision to disallow payments to the ten individuals investigated, based on lack of evidence supporting the business purpose of the expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 737 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, restricting the disallowance of commission expenditure to the ten persons subject to enquiry by the Assessing Officer. The disallowance for the remaining recipients was deleted, emphasizing that claims supported by documentary evidence cannot be disallowed without proper disproval through enquiry. The Tribunal upheld the A.O.&#039;s decision to disallow payments to the ten individuals investigated, based on lack of evidence supporting the business purpose of the expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>