https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373571 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the suspension order due to the lack of explicit reasoning for immediate action under Regulation 11(2). The court clarified that the respondent could still take action under Regulation 11(1) after following due process. The court did not delve into the merits of the allegations against the petitioner, as the primary issue was the procedural validity of the suspension under Regulation 11(2). en-us Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 16:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373571 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the suspension order due to the lack of explicit reasoning for immediate action under Regulation 11(2). The court clarified that the respondent could still take action under Regulation 11(1) after following due process. The court did not delve into the merits of the allegations against the petitioner, as the primary issue was the procedural validity of the suspension under Regulation 11(2). Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373571